Last Updated:
INDIA bloc parties have been opposing the provision whereby voters whose names were included in the electoral roll after 2003 are required to submit birth documents
The last such voter list revision in Bihar was conducted in 2003. (Image for representation: PTI)
Opposition parties have intensified their criticism of the special intensive revision of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar, with TMC MP Mahua Moitra and RJD’s Manoj Jha moving the Supreme Court seeking to quash the EC order claiming that it violated the Constitution.
Besides Moitra and Jha, several NGOs have also petitioned the court against the special intensive revision (SIR), even as the Election Commission (EC) issued a statement on Sunday saying it has not changed its instructions on the revision process.
This came after several social media posts, including one by Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, cited an advertisement by the EC published in newspapers to suggest that showing documents is not necessary.
The Congress and other INDIA bloc parties have been opposing the provision whereby voters whose names were included in the electoral roll after 2003 are required to submit documents related to birth.
“Why are people who have been voting in election after election being asked to show their documents for voting ?” Kharge said in a post on X. “When the pressure from the opposition, the public and civil society increased, the Election Commission hurriedly published these advertisements today, which state that now only a form needs to be filled and showing documents is not necessary.”
भाजपा ने चुनाव आयोग के सहयोग से, बिहार में करोड़ों लोगों का वोटिंग का अधिकार छीनने का जो मास्टर प्लॉन बनाया था, उसमें अब भाजपा खुद फँसती नज़र आ रही है। पहले दिन से ही, कांग्रेस पार्टी Special Intensive Revision of Electoral Rolls (SIR) के ख़िलाफ़ आवाज़ उठा रही है। जो लोग… pic.twitter.com/wtfbEDZWOx— Mallikarjun Kharge (@kharge) July 6, 2025
WHAT DID THE EC SAY?
In a statement, the EC made it clear that while voters were required to “submit their documents anytime before July 25, 2025″, those who failed to do so would get an opportunity “during the Claims & Objections period also”.
The poll body also urged people to “beware of statements being made by a few persons, who without reading the SIR order dated 24 June 2025… are attempting to confuse the public with their incorrect and misleading statements”.
WHAT DID THE PETITIONERS SAY?
Moitra, who moved the SC seeking quashing of the June 24 EC order under which special intensive revision (SIR) is being conducted, alleged that it violates several provisions of the Constitution and the Representation of People (RP) Act, 1950.
In her plea, she submitted that if not set aside, it can lead to large-scale disenfranchisement of eligible voters in the country, thereby undermining democracy and free and fair elections.
“The present writ petition has been filed in public interest under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking setting aside of order dated 24.06.2025 issued by Election Commission of India under which SIR of electoral rolls in Bihar is being conducted in violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 21, 325, 328 of the Constitution and provisions of Representation of People (RP) Act, 1950 and Registration of Electors (RER) Rules, 1960…,” her plea stated.
Moitra sought a direction from the apex court to restrain the EC from issuing similar orders for SIR of electoral rolls in other states.
“They have now introduced it to deprive the bonafide young electorate of Bihar, where elections are slated to be held shortly. Later, they will target Bengal, where elections are due in 2026,” Moitra told news agency PTI.
Jha, meanwhile, alleged in his plea that the EC order violated Articles 14, 21, 325 and 326 of the Constitution of India. He stated that the impugned order “is a tool of institutionalised disenfranchisement and it is being used to justify aggressive and opaque revisions of electoral rolls that disproportionately target Muslim, Dalit and poor migrant communities, as such, they are not random patterns but it is engineered exclusions”.
A similar plea has also been filed by the NGO, Association of Democratic Reforms, through advocate Prashant Bhushan. Several other civil society organisations like PUCL and activists like Yogendra Yadav have approached the top court against the EC’s direction.
While the opposition has been questioning the timing and intent of the exercise, the BJP has defended it. Leader of Opposition in the West Bengal assembly Suvendu Adhikari, however, welcomed the SIR and said such an exercise should also be conducted in the TMC-ruled state.
The last such revision in Bihar was conducted in 2003. According to the EC, the exercise was necessitated by rapid urbanisation, frequent migration, young citizens becoming eligible to vote, non-reporting of deaths, and inclusion of the names of foreign illegal immigrants.
The EC said it will scrupulously adhere to the constitutional and legal provisions as laid down in Article 326 of the Constitution and Section 16 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, in carrying out the revision.
(With PTI inputs)
The News Desk is a team of passionate editors and writers who break and analyse the most important events unfolding in India and abroad. From live updates to exclusive reports to in-depth explainers, the Desk d…Read More
The News Desk is a team of passionate editors and writers who break and analyse the most important events unfolding in India and abroad. From live updates to exclusive reports to in-depth explainers, the Desk d… Read More
- First Published:
