Last Updated: September 11, 2023, 17:41 IST
A Pakistani paramilitary soldier and Taliban fighters stand guard at a border crossing point between Pakistan and Afghanistan, in Torkham, in Khyber district. (PTI File)
Pak’s statement read: “On the 6th of September, instead of a peaceful resolution, Afghan troops resorted to indiscriminate firing, targeting Pakistan military posts, damaging the infrastructure at the Torkham Border Terminal, and putting lives at risk…”
In a sign of increasing tension between the two neighbours, Pakistan has reacted strongly to Taliban’s statement on the closure of Torkham border, saying “no structure will be allowed in their territory and that unprovoked fire was initiated by the Afghan side”. It has also asked the Taliban to ensure that the Afghan soil is not used as launching pad for terrorist attacks against Pakistan.
ALSO READ | Pakistan Shuts Key Border Crossing with Afghanistan After Guards Exchange Fire
Pakistani authorities closed the key border crossing with landlocked Afghanistan on Wednesday after border guards from the two sides exchanged fire. Also, a mortar hit a house near the Afghan border, killing five Pakistanis — a mother and her four children. The border closure came two days after caretaker Pakistani Prime Minister Anwaar-ul-Haq Kakar said the U.S. military equipment left behind during the American withdrawal from Afghanistan had fallen into militant hands and made its way to the Pakistani Taliban.
Mumtaz Zahra Baloch, Spokesperson, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in her statement, said: “The statement of the Afghan Ministry of Foreign Affairs comes as a surprise as the Interim Afghan authorities know fully well the reasons for the temporary closure of the Pakistan-Afghanistan border at Torkham.”
The ministry further added: “Pakistan cannot accept the construction of any structures by IAG inside its territory since these violate its sovereignty. On the 6th of September, instead of a peaceful resolution, Afghan troops resorted to indiscriminate firing, targeting Pakistan military posts, damaging the infrastructure at the Torkham Border Terminal, and putting the lives of both Pakistani and Afghan civilians at risk, when they were stopped from erecting such unlawful structures.”
“Such unprovoked and indiscriminate firing on Pakistani border posts cannot be justified under any circumstances. The unprovoked firing by Afghan border security forces invariably emboldens the terrorist elements. These elements are enjoying sanctuaries inside Afghanistan as confirmed by the UN Security Council’s Analytical Support and Sanctions Monitoring Team in its latest report,” the statement read.
“We have always said that we wish the border with Afghanistan to be a border of peace and amity between the two countries. We have welcomed our Afghan brothers and sisters with open arms for decades. Pakistan has continued to exercise restraint and prioritize dialogue in the face of persistent unwarranted provocations by Afghan troops deployed along the Pakistan-Afghanistan Border. Temporary closures take place only in extreme cases such as the 6th September 2023 incident on the border or when Afghan soil is used to launch terror attacks inside Pakistan,” it said.
ALSO READ | Opinion | Pakistan Gets a Taste of Its Own Medicine from Taliban
“The statement of the Afghan Ministry of Foreign Affairs also includes some irrelevant comments and unsolicited advice about Pakistan’s economy and foreign trade. For the last several decades, Pakistan has facilitated Afghan transit trade and will continue to do so. However, Pakistan cannot allow the misuse of the transit trade agreement. Pakistan stands ready to resolve all bilateral issues and concerns through constructive dialogue so that both countries can reap the dividends of economic connectivity and resultant prosperity. We expect the Afghan interim authorities to be mindful of Pakistan’s concerns, respect the territorial integrity of Pakistan and ensure that the Afghan territory is not used as a launching pad for terrorist attacks against Pakistan,” the ministry said.
With Agency Inputs
